Made EasyAccel-Heal® Made Easy

Accel-Heal® Made Easy

Complex wounds | Butcher M, Tadej M, Hampton S

Evidence For Accel-Heal®
Young et al (2011) undertook a non-blinded, clinical evaluation using Accel-Heal® of 30 patients with full thickness, venous leg ulcers that had been non-healing for more than 6 months. The wounds were formally assessed and confirmed as non-healing for two months prior to the evaluation of Accel-Heal®.

All patients were treated for 10 days and patients' wounds were monitored over a 3-month period. During this time periwound oedema had decreased by approximately 60% of the original level. This was maintained at 90 days (Young et al, 2011). In addition mean pain levels had reduced to 1.6 from 5.3 (using an 11-point score of 0=no pain and 10=worst pain) over the treatment period (Tadej et al, 2010). Exudate levels also reduced (with 51.7% lower fluid loss) at the end of the treatment period.

Chapman-Jones et al (2010) reported that 95% of chronic, non-healing venous leg ulcers studied had improved at 90 days, with 38% of going on to achieve full closure within 19 weeks. Further studies are needed to confirm the benefits of using Accel-Heal®.


Clinical benefits of Accel-Heal®
Improving rates of healing can have significant benefits for the patient: with a reduction in pain and exudate levels and improved quality of life (EWMA, 2008). Preliminary results may suggest that the device can have a positive impact on quality of life and can help to manage symptoms effectively, such as pain, exudate and oedema.

Patients can wash with the device in place. They may shower but the unit must be detached from the electrical cables. Patients' reliance on carers and nurse visits is reduced, allowing them to feel more in control and visualise a future without a wound (International Consensus, 2012).


Cost benefits of Accel-Heal®
Taylor et al (2011) undertook a formal cost-analysis of the use of Accel-Heal® on non-healing venous leg ulcers. They assumed that three devices were used per patient at a cost of £40 each. Using a Markov model, they demonstrated that Accel-Heal® was a cost-effective treatment that could produce savings. Despite the £240 upfront investment for six Accel-Heal® devices, the five-month healthcare costs of using Accel-Heal® plus dressings and compression bandaging was given as £748.94, versus £879.90 for dressings plus compression bandaging alone (Taylor et al, 2011). Use of the product as an adjunct to appropriate topical management was estimated to achieve a 27% reduction in nurse visits, a 56% reduction in bandage usage and a 27% reduction in dressings leading to a 15% reduction (£6.2 million) in total costs to the NHS.  


Summary
When the body's endogenous bioelectric system fails and cannot contribute naturally to the repair processes, introducing therapeutic levels of electrical current into the wound tissue from an external source may help to stimulate healing. This treatment has been found to be useful in hard-to-heal wounds and chronic venous leg ulcers in particular. Accel-Heal® provides a simple, safe and potentially cost effective method of ES treatment, offering benefits to patients and healthcare services alike.   

 

References

  • Arnold TE, Stanley JC, Fellows EP, Moncada GA, Allen R, et al (1994) Prospective, multicenter study of managing lower extremity venous ulcers. Ann Vasc Surg 8: 356-362
  • Assimacopoulos, D (1968a) Low intensity negative electric current in the treatment of ulcers of the leg due to chronic venous insufficiency. Preliminary report of three cases. Am J Surg 115(5): 683–7
  • Assimacopoulos D (1968b) Wound healing promotion by the use of negative electric current. Am Surg 34(6): 423-31
  • Barker A, Jaffee L, Vanable J Jr (1982) The glabrous epidermis of cavies contains a powerful battery. Am J Physiol 242: R258–66
  • Chapman-Jones D, Young S, Tadej M (2010) Assessment of wound healing following electrical stimulation with Accel-Heal. Wounds UK 6(3): 67-71
  • Cheng K, Tarjan P, Oliveira, Gandia M et al (1995) An occlusive dressing can sustain natural electric potential of wounds. J Invest Dermatol 104(4): 662-5
  • European Wound Management Association (EWMA) (2008) Position document: hard-to-heal wounds: a holistic approach. MEP Ltd, London
  • Foulds IS, Barker AT (1983) Human skin battery potentials and their possible role in wound healing. Br J Dermatol 109: 515-22
  • Gagnier KA, Manix N, Baker L, et al (1988) The effects of electrical stimulation on cutaneous oxygen supply in paraplegics. Phys Ther 68(5): 835-9
  • International Consensus (2012) Optimising wellbeing in people living with a wound. An expert working group review. London: Wounds International. Available from: www.woundsinternational.com
  • Jaffe L, Vanable JW Jr (1984) Electrical fields and wound healing. Clin Dermatol 2(3):34–44
  • Kincaid CB, Lavoie KH (1989) Inhibition of bacterial growth in vitro following stimulation with high voltage, monophasic pulsed current. Phys Therapy 69(8): 651-55
  • Kloth LC (2005) Electrical stimulation for wound healing: a review of evidence from in vitro studies, animal experiments, and clinical trials. Int J Low Extrem Wounds 4(1):23-44
  • Kloth LC, McCulloch JM (1996) Promotion of wound healing with electrical stimulation. Adv Wound Care 9(5): 42-5
  • Lee RC, Canaday SB, Doong H (1993) A review of the biophysical basis for the clinical application of electric fields in soft-tissue repair. J Burn Care Rehabil 14(3): 319-333
  • Mohr T, Akers TM, Landry RL (1987) Effect of high voltage stimulation on edema reduction in the rat hind limb. Phys Ther 67(11): 1703-8
  • Moore K (2007) Electrical stimulation for treatment of chronic wounds. J Community Nurs 21(1): 1-6
  • Ottani V, De Pasquale V, Govoni P, et al(1988) Effects of pulsed extremely low frequency magnetic fields on skin wounds in the rat. Bioelectromagnetics 9: 53-62
  • Peters EJ, Armstrong DG, Wunderlich RP, et al (1998) The benefit of electrical stimulation to enhance perfusion in persons with diabetes mellitus. J Foot Ankle Surg 37(5):396-400, 447-8
  • Reed BV (1988) Effect of high voltage pulsed electrical stimulation on microvascular permeability to prasma protein: a possible mechanism in minimizing edema. Phys Ther 68: 491-5
  • Robson MC, Hill DP, Woodske ME, Steed DL (2000) Wound healing trajectories as predictors of effectiveness of therapeutic agents. Arch Surg 135(7):773-777
  • Sugimoto M, Maeshige N, Honda H, et al (2012) Optimum microcurrent stimulation intensity for galvanotaxis in human fibroblasts. J Wound Care 21(1):5-6, 8,10
  • Schultz GS, Wysocki A (2009) Interactions between extracellular matrix and growth factors in wound healing. Wound Repair Regen;17(2):153-62
  • Tadej M, Young S, Hampton S (2010) Accel-Heal®: a new therapy for chronic wounds. J Comm Nursing 24(5)16-20
  • Taylor RR, Sladkevicius E, Guest JF (2011) Cost effectiveness of electrical stimulation therapy in managing chronic non-healing venous leg ulcers. J Wound Care 20(10):464-72
  • Troxler M, Vowden K, Vowden P (2006) Integrating adjunctive therapy into practice; the importance of recognising ‘hard to heal’ wounds. World Wide Wounds. Available from: www.worldwidewounds.com/2006/december/Troxler/Integrating-Adjunctive-Therapy-Into-Practice.html.
  • Vanable JW (1989) Integumentary potentials and wound healing. In: Borgans R et al (eds) Electrical Fields in Vertebrate Repair. Alan R Liss, New York: 183
  • van Rijswijk L (1993) Full-thickness leg ulcers: patient demographics and predictors of healing. Multi-center leg ulcer study group. J Fam Pract 36(6):625-632
  • van Rijswijk L, Polansky M (1994) Predictors of time to healing deep pressure ulcers. Ostomy Wound Manage 40(8):40-42, 44, 46-48
  • Vowden, P (2011) Hard-to-heal wounds made easy. Wounds International 2(4). Available at: http://www.woundsinternational.com/made-easys/hard-to-heal-wounds-made-easy
  • Young S, Hampton S, Tadej M (2011) Study to evaluate the effect of low-intensity pulsed electrical currents on levels of oedema in chronic non-healing wounds. J Wound Care 20(8):368, 370-3

AUTHOR DETAILS
Butcher M[1], Tadej M[2], Hampton S[3]
1. Tissue viability nurse and associate lecturer, University of Plymouth
2. Tissue viability and research nurse, Eastborne Wound Healing Centre CIC
3. Tissue viability consultant, Eastborne Wound Healing Centre CIC

Supported by Medicare Plus
For further information go to http://accelheal.com