Journal Articles

A critical evaluation of the Lund and Browder chart

Share this article

A critical evaluation of the Lund and Browder chart

Demetrius Miminas
31 August 2007

Measurement of wound size and, more specifically, surface area is an important aspect of assessing any wound. With regards to burn wounds this measurement, expressed as percentage of the total body surface area, is the cornerstone of management. The Lund and Browder chart is regarded by most authors as the most accurate in measuring this percentage and is widely used in everyday clinical practice. In this article, important clinimetric properties that are applicable to the Lund and Browder chart, such as its reliability, concurrent and construct validity, acceptability and readability will be evaluated and weaknesses will be identified.

Free for all healthcare professionals

Sign up to the Wounds Group journals





By clicking ‘Subscribe’, you are agreeing that the Wounds Group are able to email you periodic newsletters. You may unsubscribe from these at any time. Your info is safe with us and we will never sell or trade your details. For information please review our privacy policy.

Are you a healthcare professional? This website is for healthcare professionals only. To continue, please confirm that you are a healthcare professional below.

We use cookies responsibly to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your browser settings, we’ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on this website. Read about how we use cookies.

I am not a healthcare professional.